CronyCapitalism
Gambling, Racism, and Crony Capitalism
Look, I'm not exactly thrilled about this gambling bill they're trying to shove down our throats. And it's not just because I'm leaning libertarian. I mean, if you're gonna legalize gambling, do it properly – both online and in the flesh. Why not just let the market call the shots on how many casinos we can have, just like it does with malls and stadiums? We don't need the state playing high-stakes poker, teaming up with a few hand-picked developers or tribes who've got a lock on this whole casino gig. It's like they're handing out passes to a secret club, and you can bet your bottom dollar that some of these lawmakers will be first in line once they leave their cushy government seats – they even slashed the waiting period from five years to just one simply click the next website. I mean, c'mon, it's pretty rich for them to say a longer ban would hurt their precious feelings, right?
And let's cut to the chase about this whole ""Indian blood"" thing – if that's not racism, what is? We're living in an age where we're still using these outdated ideas of bloodlines to decide who's in and who's out of a tribe, and who gets a slice of the casino pie. It's like something straight out of those creepy Nuremberg Laws, measuring who's got the right kind of blood. It's messed up to think that a government-issued piece of paper – this so-called CDIB – is what sets the standards, all based on your ancestors being on some list gbbet.co.uk.
Of course, we're not as blatant about it as the Nazis were, and yeah, the intent here is to make amends for some pretty dark history igamingbusiness. But at the end of the day, when you start sorting people by their ""bloodlines,"" you're walking down a pretty dangerous path. What even is ""Indian blood""? Let's say I get a blood transfusion from a Native American, does that make me part of the tribe? Or what if it's the other way around? This bloodline thing isn't just some abstract concept – it's the same mentality that's caused all sorts of drama over who can give blood to whom. And don't get me started on how people get all puffed up about their great-great-great-grandpappy's achievements like they had anything to do with it cbsnews.
Even tribal membership is all about tracing your roots back to someone on an official list from the 1800s. But don't think it's all peace and love – there's a dark side too, like when the Cherokee Nation kicked out the descendants of slaves because they didn't have ""Cherokee blood."" Reparations, anyone?
And then there's the Mashpee Wampanoags, who are pretty much holding the winning lottery ticket when it comes to casino licenses, thanks to snagging federal recognition. The headlines are all ""Tribe Hits the Jackpot,"" but is it really about blood or just history? They got their status not long before their leader, Glenn Marshall, got busted for stealing from the tribe and playing fast and loose with campaign donations nytimes. Crony capitalism at its finest. The guy was even outed for making up some war hero story and it turns out he might not even be Wampanoag. Go figure. One of his old pals was like, ""Since when is he Wampanoag? Always thought he was Portuguese.""
Useful resources:
Komentarze